PERIOD: From 12 to 18 October
PURPOSE:
Pedagogical assessment is intrinsically linked to learning. It plays an important role in innovation in education and improvement of educational systems and, in particular, in improving students' learning. More than a technique should be seen as a powerful tool to support students in their learning.
- Then we presented in a ppt / prezzi / infographic a digital assessment strategy (DAS) adjusted to your context as a teacher/educator.
- To do this, consider the following items:
- Context (level and / or subject )
- What do you want to evaluate? (Objectives / competences)
- How to evaluate? (Activity / instrument)
- Who evaluates? (teacher / peers / student)
- With what standards? (rating criteria)
- How to assess the activity (ies) carried out?
- I integrated the artefact produces in my e-portfolio.
|
Exceeds
Expectations |
Meets
Expectations |
Needs
Improvement |
Below
Expectations |
|
|
KAHOOT Purpose |
Used clear, accurate language to restate question or
problem in student's own words. Provided examples of similar experiments. |
Used proper vocabulary to state question or problem. |
Stated question or problem using incorrect
vocabulary. Did not state problem in student's own words. |
Did not state question or problem. |
|
Organization Preparation |
Every assignment complete, accurate, and on time.
Always prepared with paper, pencil, notes, and textbook. |
Finished assignments on time. Came prepared with
paper, pencil, notes, and textbook. |
Most assignments finished on time. Usually had
paper, pencil, notes, or textbook. |
Rarely finished assignments on time. Often did not
have paper, pencil, notes, or textbook. |
|
Content Essential Question |
All information was accurate and was delivered
effectively. Subject knowledge was thorough. Extensive details and relevant
examples were used to answer the essential question. |
Subject knowledge was evident.Information included
details and strong examples that provided a clear answer to the essential
question. |
Information was relevant, but details and examples
did not address the essential question. Subject knowledge was evident, but
was not used to support argument. |
Information was confusing or irrelevant. Had few
supporting details or examples. Did not answer the essential question.
Subject knowledge was not sufficient to make successful argument. |
|
Design Creativity and
Originality |
Design was unique and interesting. Used more than
five original media items. |
Design was original. Used three to five original
media items. |
Made a few changes to background or layout. Used one
or two original media items. |
Used only design templates. Media and ideas were not
original. |
|
Media Graphics |
Used colorful and consistent backgrounds that
enhanced the mood of the project. Graphics and animations helped to clarify,
explain, and support content. |
Project used consistent background throughout. Used
graphics to support project ideas and content. |
Project used many different conflicting backgrounds.
Graphics were used, but did not always support the content. |
Project did not use backgrounds. Graphics were
inappropriate and detracted from project. |




No comments:
Post a Comment