Tuesday, November 3, 2020

WEEK 2, SELECTING DIGITAL ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES


 

PERIOD: From 12 to 18 October


PURPOSE: 

Pedagogical assessment is intrinsically linked to learning. It plays an important role in innovation in education and improvement of educational systems and, in particular, in improving students' learning. More than a technique should be seen as a powerful tool to support students in their learning. 



FORUM - Selecting Digital Assessment Strategies


  👉 Analyse and explore the resources (papers and ppt).  Identify three key ideas 

Assesment strategies
by Müjgan Tüzen - Wednesday, 21 October 2020, 4:05 PM


Digital assesments;

It has to do with the fact that teachers don't actually create learning, but rather encourage and facilitate it,teachers are guides.teachers teach and guide students are the learners!
I use Google  forms as an assessment especially on these carantina days. It is very easy and faster than paper..Quiziz and Kahoot are also very effective and easy.

Formative assesment;

Formative assessments: help students identify their strengths and weaknesses and target areas that need work.
 It means giving feedback on learning and adjusting the teaching according to results.
Quizster is a tool for formative assesment with a photo  based submission.
 
Summative assessment;

I think it is traditional way of evaluating like paper ~pen exams...A midterm exam , project  can be example for that.

Sustainable  assesment;

The view of lifelong learning and future learning are the keywords for this.
Assessing for life, not for the school is the main point here!
It sustains Forever..


  • Then we presented in a ppt / prezzi /  infographic a digital assessment strategy (DAS) adjusted to your context as a teacher/educator.

  •   To do this, consider the following items:

    • Context (level and / or subject ) 
    • What do you want to evaluate? (Objectives / competences)
    • How to evaluate? (Activity / instrument)
    • Who evaluates? (teacher / peers / student)
    • With what standards? (rating criteria)
    • How to assess the activity (ies) carried out?

  •  I integrated the artefact produces  in my e-portfolio.


Exceeds Expectations

Meets Expectations

Needs Improvement

Below Expectations

KAHOOT

Purpose

Used clear, accurate language to restate question or problem in student's own words. Provided examples of similar experiments.

Used proper vocabulary to state question or problem.

Stated question or problem using incorrect vocabulary. Did not state problem in student's own words.

Did not state question or problem.

Organization

Preparation

Every assignment complete, accurate, and on time. Always prepared with paper, pencil, notes, and textbook.

Finished assignments on time. Came prepared with paper, pencil, notes, and textbook.

Most assignments finished on time. Usually had paper, pencil, notes, or textbook.

Rarely finished assignments on time. Often did not have paper, pencil, notes, or textbook.

Content

Essential Question

All information was accurate and was delivered effectively. Subject knowledge was thorough. Extensive details and relevant examples were used to answer the essential question.

Subject knowledge was evident.Information included details and strong examples that provided a clear answer to the essential question.

Information was relevant, but details and examples did not address the essential question. Subject knowledge was evident, but was not used to support argument.

Information was confusing or irrelevant. Had few supporting details or examples. Did not answer the essential question. Subject knowledge was not sufficient to make successful argument.

Design

Creativity and Originality

Design was unique and interesting. Used more than five original media items.

Design was original. Used three to five original media items.

Made a few changes to background or layout. Used one or two original media items.

Used only design templates. Media and ideas were not original.

Media

Graphics

Used colorful and consistent backgrounds that enhanced the mood of the project. Graphics and animations helped to clarify, explain, and support content.

Project used consistent background throughout. Used graphics to support project ideas and content.

Project used many different conflicting backgrounds. Graphics were used, but did not always support the content.

Project did not use backgrounds. Graphics were inappropriate and detracted from project.




               
                                         


   My  PPT LINK OF DAS  👈









No comments:

Post a Comment

PEER ASSESMENT

  PEER REVIEW WORK The peer review work will be done  from 1 to 5 December 2020.